Resveratrol Truths - Is Resveratrol Actually Capable of Fighting Cancer?

Pancreatic Cancer Statistics :

Post the discovery of the "French paradox", there has been constant speculation that apart from improving health and fighting aging, resveratrol is a great anti-carcinogen too. The speculation surely has created enough ripples both among the medical fraternity that has been committed to finding cure for the lethal disease as well as the health enthusiasts who have been committed to ensuring a perfectly disease-free and healthy existence for themselves and the people around them.

The big question that however remains to be answered is whether or not resveratrol is worth being banked upon as a probable cure for cancers. Is the component that imbibes such amazing health and anti-aging benefits capable of preventing and curing cancers too? Or is the entire buzz a mere myth? Read on to find all the answers:

Pancreatic Cancer Statistics

1. Resveratrol's Anti-ageing Impact Is A Ray Of Positive Hope

Pancreatic Cancer Statistics :Resveratrol Truths - Is Resveratrol Actually Capable of Fighting Cancer?

That resveratrol is an excellent anti-aging formula is unquestionable. Let's get a bit deep into how the food manages to counter ageing. Well, it fights the oxidative stress and prevents cell degeneration. Now this very cell degeneration is the prime cause of cancers. So resveratrol consumption can be expected to assist the DNA in producing healthy cells and thereby prevent cancer growths. The component also causes the cancer cells to die prematurely and thereby prevents cancer propagation by metastasis.

2. The Component's Energy Boosting Potential Too Holds Relevance In Curing Cancers

As seen above, resveratrol is perfect to inhibit and prevent the growth of cancer cells and tumors. But the wonderful part is that the component can help those already suffering from cancer too. As we all know, the chemotherapy involved in cancer cure is really painful and drains all energies of the sufferer. Resveratrol then skyrockets individual energy levels to sustain the ill effects of the harsh treatment and aids the healing process.

3. Resveratrol Improves Mitochondrial Operation Too

The component is also known to improve the operation of mitochondria through coordinated cell signaling and reduced superoxide levels in the system. The result is clearly greater chances of cancer prevention.

4. Scientific Studies And Researches Back These Claims

Studies conducted on mice clearly show that regular resveratrol consumption inhibited cancer and tumor formations in them. This was then discovered to hold relevance from human perspective too. The food has been looked upon as an active retarder for breast, gastric, colon, esophageal, oral, prostate, skin and pancreatic cancer cells and leukemia. No wonder then, statistics clearly show that French and Japanese suffer the minimal risks of contracting cancers. Resveratrol nourishment for both through wine and Japanese knotweed respectively can then directly be linked to this behavior.

Considering all of the above information, my suggestion to you would be to begin consuming resveratrol at the earliest. Help resveratrol to become a part of your daily diet by consuming supplements. The below link should help you amply over choosing the most authentic and effective ones.

Pancreatic Cancer Statistics :Resveratrol Truths - Is Resveratrol Actually Capable of Fighting Cancer?

Reasons to Consider Alcohol Detox

Pancreatic Cancer Statistics :

Alcohol detox can help those who are dependent on alcohol to stop drinking.

Alcohol detox is when you take a short course of medication to minimise the worst effects of alcohol withdrawal. Alcohol detox does not magically stop someone drinking but gets alcohol out of their system so they can focus on rehabilitation and life without drink.

Pancreatic Cancer Statistics

If you're regularly drinking heavily, you could be seriously risking your health and even your job, relationships and mental health. Drinking above the limits outlined by the Government can be potentially hazardous - currently the limits are 21 units of alcohol per week for men and 14 for women (with no more than four or three units per day respectively).

Pancreatic Cancer Statistics :Reasons to Consider Alcohol Detox

Minimise alcohol health risks

The health risks associated with heavy drinking are reason enough alone to consider alcohol detox. It increases the risks of developing serious illness such as cirrhosis of the liver, pancreatic damage, some cancers, heart conditions and more.

Statistics suggest that a third of men and one in seven women regularly drink too much. Experts suggest that the more alcohol you drink, the greater the risks to your health.

Avoid personal problems

As well as health issues, problem drinking can also trigger a range of personal problems. For example, people who get very drunk may say or do things which they regret. Heavy drinking is often associated with violence and arguments.

In addition heavy drinking can cause people to miss work or not perform as well as usual when they are there.

Heavy drinking can also cause problems between friends, couples and families. Others may become annoyed by someone's drinking and alcoholism can also lead to secrecy and lying which weakens trust in relationships.

Alcohol is expensive and those who are dependent on alcohol may find that they are spending more than they can afford on drink. Debt or lack of money can cause stress which then encourages more drinking, leading to a vicious cycle.

Beat alcohol addiction

In many cases, alcohol detox as well as therapy and aftercare can help people beat alcohol addiction and stay off drink permanently. Many people who are alcoholic drink every day and often drink to beat unpleasant (and potentially very serious) withdrawal symptoms. It's estimated that around 2% of women are alcoholics and up to 6% of men.

It's important to note that anyone who is dependent on alcohol should always seek medical advice before stopping drinking. You may well be able to do it at home but a doctor will ensure that you stop drinking safely - suddenly stopping can be very dangerous.

Pancreatic Cancer Statistics :Reasons to Consider Alcohol Detox

To Be or Not To Be: Low Carb...

Pancreatic Cancer Statistics :

I get asked all the time, "what do you think about the Atkin's Diet?". Well, as a Nutritional Bio-Chemist, my opinion and answer to that question would have to be a biochemical response.

First of all, lets start with the foundation of the Atkins Diet. Robert Atkins did not invent the Low Carb diet. It was first administered over 80 years ago by John Hopkins Medical School and Hospital for the treatment of pediatric Epilepsy. It was then modified for the U.S. Air Force long before Robert Atkins picked it up to modify it once again.

Pancreatic Cancer Statistics

Our bodies run on glucose as a fuel. We can not store glucose and have enough for about 24 hours. When we have no food for 24 hours, the body turns to burn fat for energy and this is called Ketosis. By having a diet at 80% fat, and these are the right type of fats, some protein and almost no carbohydrates, the body remains in Ketosis and the pH of the blood can change, which can alleviate seizures, either the severity or the occurrence all together.

Pancreatic Cancer Statistics :To Be or Not To Be: Low Carb...

It is speculated to work because the pancreas has no or low signal to release insulin to counter or escort the glucose into the cells. Keeping the insulin steady in the system will not trigger seizures in the brain.

Like in all things, an excess can bring on side-effects. Some side effects of a Low Carb or Ketogenic Diet may include kidney stones and gall stones, some women may have menstrual irregularities. Because of the amount of fat and protein in the diet, some may suffer from Pancreatitis or inflammation of the pancreas, because there is an increase of fat, some minerals will not absorb correctly, so there can be decreased bone density and sometimes eye problems, sometimes there is a high level of fat build up in the blood, especially if the person is deficient in certain digestive enzymes. All these side effects can be very serious and that is why the Ketogenic Diet has always been administered by Nutritional-Medical professionals within the care of a hospital.

Low Carb or No Carb diets can be deceiving, especially since the goal is to keep the blood glucose levels steady.
There are some sugar substitutes that are 50% protein, this protein can cause an increase of activity within the cell. As any diabetic can tell you, the use of Aspartame, which is 50 percent phenylalanine, can cause the blood sugar to go out of control. Phenylalanine should not be taken by pregnant women or by people who suffer from anxiety attacks, diabetes, high blood pressure, phenylketonuria (PKU), or preexisting pigmented melanoma, a type of skin cancer, this is directed by the medical and medical research community.
Aspertame also is made up of Aspartic Acid and methyl alcohol or wood alcohol. So, not only do you have the risk of toxicity because of the amino acid phenylalanine, you also have methanol which is considered poisonous even in small amounts. Methanol can cause blindness, brain swelling, and inflammation of the pancreas and heart muscle.

Splenda or Sucralose has still other problems, it was not studied thoroughly before the FDA approved it. Under scrutiny of the biochemical community, especially after Aspertame was approved without long term study, the following has been noted, this taken from the http://www.low-carbdiet.co.uk/splenda.htm website.

"...Few human studies of safety have been published on sucralose. One small study of diabetic patients using the sweetener showed a statistically significant increase in glycosylated hemoglobin (Hba1C), which is a marker of long-term blood glucose levels and is used to assess glycemic control in diabetic patients. According to the FDA, "increases in glycosolation in hemoglobin imply lessening of control of diabetes.

Research in animals has shown that sucralose can cause many problems in rats, mice, and rabbits, such as:

Shrunken thymus glands (up to 40% shrinkage)

Enlarged liver and kidneys.

Atrophy of lymph follicles in the spleen and thymus

Increased cecal weight

Reduced growth rate

Decreased red blood cell count

Hyperplasia of the pelvis

Extension of the pregnancy period

Aborted pregnancy

Decreased fetal body weights and placental weights

Diarrhea

According to one source (Sucralose Toxicity Information Center), concerning the significant reduction in size of the thymus gland, "the manufacturer claimed that the sucralose was unpleasant for the rodents to eat in large doses and that starvation caused the shrunken thymus glands.

[Toxicologist Judith] Bellin reviewed studies on rats starved under experimental conditions, and concluded that their growth rate could be reduced by as much as a third without the thymus losing a significant amount of weight (less than 7 percent). The changes were much more marked in rats fed on sucralose. While the animals' growth rate was reduced by between 7 and 20 percent, their thymuses shrank by as much as 40 percent. (New Scientist 23 Nov 1991, pg 13)"

A compound chemically related to sucrose, 6-chloro-deoxyglucose, is known to have anti-fertility and neurotoxic effects, although animal studies of sucralose have not shown these effects.
According to the FDA's "Final Rule" report, "Sucralose was weakly mutagenic in a mouse lymphoma mutation assay." The FDA also reported many other tests as having "inconclusive" results.
Just how few studies currently exist on sucralose is an issue. Endurance News provides the following table illustrating this fact:

Sweetener + # of Studies*

Saccharin

2374

Aspartame

598

Cyclamates

459

Acesulfame-K

28

Sucralose

19

*Number of studies determined by MEDLINE search.

In terms of safety, it is not just the original substance (sucralose) that one needs to worry about. As the FDA notes, "Because sucralose may hydrolyze in some food products...the resulting hydrolysis products may also be ingested by the consumer."

I went into a forum looking for research information. There were many comments about Sucralose, most saying that if there was negative information about a product, that it was bogus because the FDA would have never approved it. The FDA approved the drug combination of Phen-Fen, which caused heart problems for thousands of people, some irreversible. Sure, it helped them to lose weight, but they didn't have their health to live it after words.

Then we have Sugar Alcohols, like...sorbitol, xylitol, mannitol, lactitol, maltitol and others.

Sugar alcohols are alcohols that are derived from sugar molecules. They are a carbohydrate, but according to the FDA, sugar alcohols have a very small impact on blood sugar levels and insulin release in the body. They are incompletely absorbed from the small intestine into the blood and as a result, they have a lesser impact on blood glucose levels. Some of the polyol that is not absorbed into the blood is broken down into fatty acids in the large intestine and sugar alcohols do contain calories, about three-fourths as many as sugar. Since they are incompletely absorbed by the intestine, over-consumption may produce a laxative effect in some people. Sugar alcohols can also act as "trigger foods," causing carbohydrate cravings or binges and there is some evidence to suggest that products containing polyols may actually defer weight loss efforts. In some people, sugar alcohols can have uncomfortable side effects, such as bloating and gas. Some diabetics also report elevated blood sugars when eating some low carbohydrate products, particularly sugar alcohol containing candies.

So is the "Low Carb" diet or diets the answer for weight loss and glucose control. As a biochemist, I would have to say no. Because different carbohydrates absorb differently in individuals, you can not count on those types of food and calumniated absorption rates. The only way that you can tell what that food, and combinations of foods will do to your body, it to actually test the blood in 15 minute increments for a period of 2 to 3 hours. If your blood remains steady, then that food, that amount of food, or that combination of food will not be detrimental.
Along with many scientists in this field, I too have written the FDA to appeal for better labeling for the public. The "Low-Carb" label is deceptive and damaging for those who rely on blood glucose control for quality of life. To say that a product is Low-Carb doesn't mean that it is low in calories, will not affect your blood sugar, or is even healthy. As a matter of fact, most of the time's when something suggests that it is "Low-Carb" it is a product that should be heavily scrutinized and avoided.

And as far as the new craze of Glycemic Index or Glucose diet. This is a very expensive diet to be on because of the supply of Glucometers, Glucose Sticks and time it takes to test, but a much safer method and more conclusive method of dieting in order to keep your carbohydrate intake under control and your blood sugar under control. As a scientist the only problem that I have with the GI or Canadian diet is that products and manufacturers who label a product as low, medium or High Glycemic Index do not have a standard of calculating those numbers. There are 8 different ways to calculate what a Glycemic Index is, and none of them are wrong. Some are more correct than others, but depending on what method you use, algebraic or Calculus and for what you are testing for, will determine if those numbers are correct. Don't get me wrong, Glycemic Indexing is much more correct than calculating "net carbs" or determining if something is "Low Carb", because you have proven results from a field of subjects to tell you how the product will be absorb from true blood glucose numbers. Because this method allows you to see actual results from what was ingested, you can believe that you are eating right and maintaining better health.

For the most part, people ask me about Dieting because they want to be thin and healthy, but being healthy is not just about this diet or that diet. Being healthy has to do with lifestyle more than anything else. Eating a diet of functional foods, healthy foods, non-processed foods, being active and interactive, and being relaxed and well rested has a lot to do with how your body will respond as far as health is concerned.
Do I recommend a "Diet", not necessarily, what I recommend is a lifestyle for better health that is as individual as the person it is designed for. How do you do that? You need to not only look at your body type, but your genetic background, your personality and your day to day habits. You can work on your taste in foods first. To get away from the sweets, salt and processing, you can start by eliminating the processed foods out of your diet. Remember when you had "home cooked meals from scratch", a salad "out of the garden", made Jams and Jellies from the fruit off the trees in Grandma's yard? These tasted better and were better than those we buy off the shelf now days. It takes a lot of time, but the time spent in eating better will pay off in the retirement years. The next step would be to get active, exercise, go for a walk everyday, chase your children around the yard with a football, walk the mall with your daughters or your grand baby in a stroller, ride your bikes as a family, play soccer in the backyard with your kids, play a game of catch with your son, all these will improve your bodies response to some many things. Start slow with things, take your personality and your job into account so that it will be a lifestyle of habit and happiness, not a routine of forced misery.

Pancreatic Cancer Statistics :To Be or Not To Be: Low Carb...

Death by Cigarettes

Pancreatic Cancer Statistics :

It has long been known that smoking and lung cancer are causally linked. After having discovered this association though, much has been made of the heightened incidence of other forms of cancer caused by of smoking. I am going to highlight the data that reiterates the claims and suggest that the evidence is not so strong for other forms of cancer being causally linked with smoking. The evidence is analysed from the mortality statistics for the UK in 2002.

I will work through the statistics because 26% of the population are smokers and so one might reasonably assume that any incidence of cancer where less than 26% of sufferers are smokers may have other more prevalent causes than smoking.

Pancreatic Cancer Statistics

Firstly, we will deal with the cancer deaths so lets get underway with the 33,600 deaths from lung cancer. 84% of these deaths were in smokers. This means that the average 26% of the smoking population yielded more than three times the proportion of deaths - a clear link.

Pancreatic Cancer Statistics :Death by Cigarettes

Oesophageal cancer deaths numbered just under 5,000 and the deceased were found to be 66% smokers, 71% and 65% men to women respectively; again another clear link that smoking and oesophageal cancer are linked.

Next, bladder cancer takes over 1,800 lives per year of which 37% are found to be smokers. However, only 19% of female cases were smokers compared with 47% of male cases. It is fair to assume that there are other factors more prevalent in female bladder cancer other than smoking but the link is clear in men.

Stomach cancer took 1,650 lives in 2002 but is found in 35% of men compared with only 11% of female smokers. It is reasonable therefore to draw the same conclusion about the causes as for bladder cancer between men and women.

Pancreatic cancer is another cancer that is less prevalent in smokers than the general population. Indeed 20% of men and 26% of women dying from the disease in 2002 were smokers, suggesting parity with women and a disparity with men. It may be reasonable therefore to assume that there are other contributory factors in male pancreatic cancers.

Death from cancer of the upper respiratory tract was found at a rate of 66% in smokers, nearly three times the percentage of smokers. Note though that women sufferers represented half of their cohort compared with three quarters of men, suggesting upper respiratory cancer is more likely in men than in women smokers.

Kidney cancer is another cancer where smokers are seen less frequently than non-smokers in the statistics.

The next disease we shall look at is the non-cancerous, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or COPD. The disease manifests itself mainly in two forms, being emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

Emphysema is the destruction of the lung leading to loss of surface area, alveoli (air sacks in the lungs) and the loss of elasticity. Chronic bronchitis manifests itself through swollen bronchii and over production of mucus within the lung. It is characterised by daily coughing, bringing up sputum. Both emphysema and bronchitis lead to slow, debilitating and frustrating deaths for their victims.

Deaths from COPD in 2002 in the UK numbered 28,500 of which 84% were smokers demonstrating a clear link between the inhalation of tobacco smoke and the disease as is the case with lung cancer.

Some sources suggest that pneumonia is more likely to kill in smokers but only 17% of the 36,000 fatal pneumonia cases were found in smokers suggesting this is not the case.

Finally, heart disease is the biggest single killer in the UK with over a quarter of a million deaths a year as a result of its various forms.

Of all the major forms of heart disease, ischaemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, aortic aneurysm, myocardial degeneration and atherosclerosis, the percentage of smokers suffering from aortic aneuryism was just under 60%. All other forms of heart disease showed near 26% or below. This suggests that smoking may not be the main contributory factor but it almost certainly will have had an impact.

All in all, there were over 114,000 premature deaths in 2002 from cigarette smoking, mostly from cancer, but also from heart disease and pulmonary (lung) disease. The best way to improve ones chances of not suffering from a shortened life and succumbing to one of the diseases mentioned in this article is by quitting smoking once and for all. Benefits have been clearly documented and the sooner smokers quit, the bigger the benefits of quitting become on their life expectancy. Indeed, smokers who quit before they reach thirty, statistically negate virtually all the ill health effect of smoking and can generally expect to live as long as a non-smoking contemporary.

Pancreatic Cancer Statistics :Death by Cigarettes

Even The Elderly Can Fight Back Against Cancer

Pancreatic Cancer Statistics :

It was not so long ago that an elderly person suffering from cancer would have received limited treatment and been sent home to die.

"The common thoughts used to be that it wasn't worth treating cancer in older patients; that they'd lived their lives; they might be dying anyway; they couldn't tolerate the treatment; the treatment might adversely affect their quality of life; or that they didn't want to live with the side effects of treatment," said Gary Shapiro, MD, chairman of the department of oncology at Johns Hopkins Bayview and co-founder of its Geriatric Oncology program.

Pancreatic Cancer Statistics

That would not have been particularly good news to people like Charlotte, an 83-year-old local woman who five years ago was diagnosed with breast cancer. Today, after surgery and chemotherapy, Charlotte remains in remission and lives an active live that includes traveling, taking adult education classes, gardening and spending quality time with her children and grandchildren.

Pancreatic Cancer Statistics :Even The Elderly Can Fight Back Against Cancer

Nor, would it have been good news to a neighbor of Charlotte's, 91-year-old Gordon, who was diagnosed with prostate cancer when he was 85. In the past, the philosophy was that with a slow growing tumor like this, there would be no reason to intervene. Gordon's physician, however, convinced the tumor was aggressive, suggested an intensive protocol of radiation. Six years later, he is still driving, playing an occasional round of golf and competing in bridge tournaments.

When Charlotte was first diagnosed with cancer, her children's first thought was that they didn't want to put their mother through any rigorous regimen that would affect her quality of life. Only after the oncologist, who had considerable experience in working with geriatric patients, assured them that he thought Charlotte was healthy enough to cope with the treatment and had a good prognosis, did they feel comfortable with having her undergo treatment. Gordon's children were equally concerned about their dad having radiation. He tolerated the treatments well and has not looked back since.

A Disease of Aging
Cancer can strike anyone at any age, but it is considered a disease of aging. The average age of those diagnosed with all types of cancer is 70. Certain cancers, such as breast, colon, prostate, pancreatic, lung, bladder and stomach cancer, are linked to aging. For lung cancer, for example, the average age of onset is 72; for colon cancer it's 71; breast cancer is 68. These statistics notwithstanding, relatively little is known about how cancers develop and progress in older patients or how best to treat them.

What is known is that recent research has shown that many older cancer patients can tolerate more aggressive treatment than they have typically received. Yet, this group of cancer patients has not been studied in proportion to its size so there is still a dearth of information in understanding the functional, physical, mental, pharma-therapeutic and socio-economic factors that affect the course of disease and outcome of treatment decisions.

In many cases, older people with cancer present with other medical conditions as well. They may have heart disease or diabetes, for example, and the cancer may impact those problems, and conversely.

When it comes to treatment for cancer, older adults:

• May be less tolerant of certain cancer treatments
• Have a decreased reserve (i.e. a capacity to respond to disease and treatment)
• Have other medical problems that also need to be treated
• Have functional problems, such as memory loss or an inability with the ADLs.
• May lack any support network

Additionally, medical professionals need to take into account an older patient's susceptibility to falling and breaking a hip, which can greatly compromise cancer treatment. This may mean the need to prescribe physical therapy to increase strength and reduce risks with a patient who may become weaker as a result of treatment.

Similarly, nutrition may pose a problem when it comes to tolerating certain types of treatment. A dietitian may need to create a nutrition program to boost the patient's health status prior to any intervention. A home care professional may be needed to take care of the patient until treatment is completed, particularly for those without any family caregivers living nearby.

Yet, all this notwithstanding, cancer survivors like Charlotte and Gordon, who are both living full lives, are testaments to the need not to write off geriatric cancer patients, but rather to make sure they receive comprehensive assessments in developing the right care plan once they've been diagnosed.

Pancreatic Cancer Statistics :Even The Elderly Can Fight Back Against Cancer

The Causes of Cancer - What Causes This Potentially Deadly Disease?

Pancreatic Cancer Statistics :

Cancer is one of the most lethal medical conditions, even though different traditional and alternative treatments are available. Following logic, the best way for prevention is to know and recognize the causes of cancer. For this reason, it is perfectly natural for you to ask what causes this condition.

Despite the extensive research and the constant advancement of science, the causes of most types of cancer remain unknown. This group includes some of the most common types of cancer, such as breast cancer, prostate cancer and colorectal cancer. However, thanks to research and medical observation, the main risk factors for many different types of cancer have been identified.

Pancreatic Cancer Statistics

It is important to differentiate between causes of cancer and risk factors. If you have the risk factors, you are more likely to develop the condition. However, this does not mean that you will get it. In fact, for some types, such as oral cancer, approximately 25% of all patients have not been at higher risk before being diagnosed with the condition.

Pancreatic Cancer Statistics :The Causes of Cancer - What Causes This Potentially Deadly Disease?

Simply put, no one is perfectly safe from getting such a disease. Despite this, provided that you know the risk factors, you can work to eliminate them and reduce your risk of developing cancer. It should be pointed out that some factors can be eliminated, while others cannot.

Smoking and cigarette smoking to be exact, is identified as the single most significant factor leading to lung cancer. Statistics show that it is responsible for over 85% of all cases. A large number of the remaining 15% of the cases are due to passive smoking and cigar and tobacco smoking. In fact, over 1,000 passive smokers die of lung cancer each year. Smoking can also increase the risk of other types of cancer, such as kidney, pancreatic, stomach and cervical cancer. For this reason, not smoking is one of the most effective ways for prevention.

Above normal weight and obesity are other serious risk factors. They increase the risk of breast, colon, kidney, endometrial and prostate cancer. The level of risk is not the same for all conditions. Even though obesity cannot be linked directly to other types of cancer other than endometrial cancer, it can reduce your health risk significantly in general. For this reason losing weight through a low-calorie diet and exercise is particularly important.

In fact, the diet can also be considered to lead to increased risk of cancer, even though it is certainly not considered to be one of the causes of cancer. According to researchers the diet full of animal fats increases the risk of prostate cancer. Similarly, a diet low in fiber may put you at higher risk of colorectal cancer. That is why a healthy diet rich in fruits and vegetables is essential.

Recent studies show that alcohol consumption can also be a risk factor for different types of cancer. It has been discovered that women who consume more than one drink every day are more likely to develop breast cancer. For this reason, avoiding drinking can be beneficial.

Exposure to the sun is the main cause of skin cancer. You can protect yourself by avoiding sun exposure and sunbathing in the afternoon. Wearing sunscreen and protective clothing is a must.

Exposure to radiation is another one of the most significant cancer risk factors. Other factors, such as exposure to asbestos are equally risky. Still, such exposures are rare in general.

Some viruses are directly or indirectly responsible for cancer development. For instance, some HPV virus infections, considered sexually transmitted diseases, can lead to cervical cancer. In addition, a person suffering from hepatitis is more likely to develop liver cancer.

Aging is not one of the causes of cancer, but the risk of most types increases with age. This can be explained by the fact that cells become more vulnerable to factors that can cause a change in their DNA structure as the body ages. In turn, they are more likely to become abnormal and to grow into a malignant tumor.

Genetics may be one of the causes of cancer. Many types of cancer are known to run in families. For example, a woman's risk of breast cancer increases around two times, if she has a mother, sister or daughter who has or has had the condition. Regrettably, researchers are still working to discover the exact genes that can lead to the growth of tumors. Despite this, individuals in higher risk can have medical screenings more regularly, as a form of prevention.

Pancreatic Cancer Statistics :The Causes of Cancer - What Causes This Potentially Deadly Disease?

The Danger Of Alcoholism Binge Drinking

Pancreatic Cancer Statistics :

Alcoholism binge drinking is one of the known public health issue today. Recognizing the root of this kind of problem will save not only your own life but people who love you the most.

Many people do not think that they have an issue with alcohol because they only drink occasionally but research proves that even consuming too much alcohol when drinking occasionally could be detrimental to ones health.

Pancreatic Cancer Statistics

Alcoholism binge drinking was defined by The National Institute on Alcohol and alcoholism as a blueprint of the consumption of alcohol that can cause your blood alcohol concentration level to increase; (BAC) to 0.08% or higher.

Pancreatic Cancer Statistics :The Danger Of Alcoholism Binge Drinking

The pattern is equivalent to four or more alcoholic beverages for women and five or more for men in just a certain occasion. Too much drinking is also associated with this kind of addiction.

In short, the above mentioned pertains to when guy drinks ten or more alcoholic beverages and eight or more for a girl. It is very dangerous to your health.

As what is mentioned above this disorder may trigger some health problems and may bring your life to danger. Some of these major health risks are heart attack, alcohol abuse, and it may harm a developing fetus in a women's womb. Other problems that may occur are pancreatitis, cancers, high blood pressure, liver cirrhosis and psychological problem.

Injuries like vehicular accidents, drowning, and accidentally shot by someone are some risk associated with it. It may take your life or bring it in danger.

Alcoholism binge drinking not only affects the body physically because it also puts someone at risk for mental and social disorders. Statistics have proven that individuals involved in alcoholism binge drinking tend to have financial issues combined with social issues when interacting with friends or family. It is a terrible disorders that is extremely dangerous and can hurt others around. Receiving proper treatment will greatly assist in someone who is suffering from this kind of disorder.

Pancreatic Cancer Statistics :The Danger Of Alcoholism Binge Drinking